Public Meeting Open House
Meeting Goals
|
|
|
|
Provide project background |
|
Why is the city doing this
project on Spenard Road? |
|
Provide project update |
|
What is the project status? |
|
What have we learned from
analysis to date? |
|
What we learned from our
Citizens Advisory Group |
|
What is the engineer’s
recommended solution? |
|
Receive input |
|
Public suggestions on
recommended solution |
|
Site specific concerns and
ideas |
Project Background
|
|
|
Where did project originate? |
|
What does project encompass? |
|
Will the project include
landscaping and amenities for transit riders, pedestrians and bicyclists? |
Project Background
Why Spenard Road?
|
|
|
|
Public Safety Issues |
|
For motorists |
|
392 reported crashes (1996 to
1998) 130 per year |
|
839 reported crashes (1999 to
2005) 120 per year |
|
Spenard Road Crash Rate 12.45 |
|
crashes per million vehicle
miles |
|
|
|
Arctic Blvd. 5.21
(4-lane) |
|
Fireweed Lane 7.03 (4-lane) |
|
Tudor Road 3.86 (5-lane with center turn lane) |
|
|
Lane Reductions Improve
Safety
|
|
|
|
15th Avenue BEFORE and AFTER |
|
Using 3 years of data |
|
Street Crash Rate per million
vehicle-miles |
|
15th Avenue 5.64 (before
changes) |
|
15th Avenue 3.07 (after
changes) |
|
|
|
For comparison: the Spenard Road crash rate is 12.45
crashes per million vehicle-miles |
North American Experience
Number of Lanes
|
|
|
|
|
Current engineering guidance
from American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials |
|
Recommends: |
|
2 lane roadways J |
|
3 lane roadways (example Lower
Spenard) J |
|
5 lane roadways J (example Tudor,
Muldoon) |
|
No longer recommends: |
|
4 lane roadways without a median L -- due to safety concerns |
|
Bottom line -- new roads will
have 3-lane, 4-lane divided, or 5-lane configurations |
Why Spenard Road?
|
|
|
|
Public Safety Issues |
|
City wide Anchorage experiences
220 bike/ped crashes per year |
|
Spenard Road experiences 8.6
bike/ped crashes per year |
|
43 bike/pedestrian collisions
(1998 to 2002) |
|
|
|
The city would be remiss if it
did not consider this a problem to be solved. |
Slide 10
Slide 11
Other Spenard Road
Goals/Needs
|
|
|
|
Accommodate existing and future
traffic |
|
Rehabilitation of pavement |
|
Upgrade utilities where needed |
|
Utilities undergrounding to be
requested where appropriate |
|
Upgrade to ADA Standards |
|
Conform to Existing Plans
(Areawide Trails Plan, Anchorage 2020) |
|
|
Current & Future
Vehicle Traffic
The problem…
No facilities for
bicyclists throughout corridor
Spenard @ Chugach Way
Slide 17
Left turn collisions at
this driveway
Pedestrian use throughout
corridor
Offset intersections
throughout corridor
Sloping driveways
throughout project corridor
Inadequate sidewalks and
transit stops throughout the corridor
From Hillcrest Drive
North
The opportunities…
Gateways and Entrances
|
|
|
Identify entrances |
|
Begin to define character |
|
Build on landmarks |
Lighting
|
|
|
Unify area and define character |
|
|
|
Safety and security |
|
|
|
Color and seasons |
Improved Transit Stops
The challenges…
|
|
|
|
Working with a concerned
business community on: |
|
Parking issues |
|
Customer access |
|
Construction access |
|
Minimizing impacts during
construction |
|
The neighborhood continues to
change |
|
Finding solutions to social
problems |
|
|
The solution…
|
|
|
Reduce the number of lanes |
|
Reallocate space so the road is
safer for all modes -- including pedestrians and bicyclists |
Alternatives Considered
Alternatives Considered
Alternatives Considered
Alternatives Considered
Recommended Solution:
Spenard Road (Except at Major Intersections)
Recommended Solution:
Spenard Road (Except at Major Intersections)
The benefits…
|
|
|
A safer road |
|
Calms traffic |
|
Accommodates most vulnerable
citizens -- pedestrians and bicyclists |
|
Provides opportunities for
beautification |
Recommended Solution --
Spenard/36th/Minnesota Area
Minnesota Drive/Spenard
Road Couplet
|
|
|
|
|
Solves transportation network
problem |
|
If we do nothing -- level of
service “F” |
|
If we create the couplet --
level of service “D” |
|
The amount of time over 1 year
a daily commuter driving through Minnesota/Spenard, would spend waiting at
the intersection |
|
In 2028 without the improvement
-- 25.6 hours/year |
|
In 2028 with the improvement --
6.7 hours/year |
What do we need from you?
|
|
|
|
Your thoughtful review of the
drawings |
|
Your comments about design
specifics |
|
Specific locations |
|
Specific concerns -- for
bicyclists, pedestrians, motorists |
|
Your suggestions for a theme
for landscaping and amenities |
Questions?
|
|
|
Time for questions is limited. |
|
If we don’t get to your
question, please ask a team member during the open house or write them on a
comment sheet and provide contact information so we may respond. |